keira knightley face

images And here we see Ms. Knightley keira knightley face. Caption This: Keira Knightley
  • Caption This: Keira Knightley



  • vkannan
    06-08 06:46 PM
    That "small change" of EB2 China PD is very important. It suggests that there is going to be "Spill over" so EB2 India and China will have to move together to use the unused numbers. A good sign; at least EB1 retrogression does not seem to be likely and there will be some spill over numbers to EB2 India (EB2 china may not benefit much as it had a PD later than that for the rest of the year.

    Scorpion: how can you say "no spill over". EB2ROW is current and so spill over is likely (more likely from EB1 and even to some extent from EB2 ROW)
    Moreover, EB2 ROW remained current meaning that they have not used all their quota; they will not use any spillover numbers and they may even provide spill over numbers to EB2 India and China.

    Maybe:
    Last year USCIS/DOS did the spill over in Aug/Sep, before doing the spill over they did bring china and India Cut-off date to have the same date. yes your thought could be right, there are some visas which they are "Forecasting" would be available for spill over.....

    Maybe Not:
    Its Just a forecasting right(v all know how good USCIS/DOS are when it comes to forecasting...) they might very well be proven wrong ......and moving china EB2 to India EB2 does not going to affect them in any way.....





    wallpaper Caption This: Keira Knightley keira knightley face. Keira Knightley
  • Keira Knightley



  • Karthikthiru
    09-11 11:37 AM
    Numbersusa site says that it will be back on Sep 18





    keira knightley face. See the Keira Knightley
  • See the Keira Knightley



  • thehulkdeals
    08-16 01:00 PM
    EB3 for ROW has retrogressed quite a bit and this could actually be a great opportunity to beef up the DC rally with people from the rest of the world. It would be much better to have legal immigrants from all over the world protesting instead of just Indians and some Chinese. Core group, time to look in that direction since we only have a month before the rally? I expect there to be a lot of Europeans and Aussies on the East Coast on EB-3.

    I am still trying to understand this GC process. My PD (EB3-ROW) is March 31, 2006. I do not see that this Spt bulletin is a good news for me. So When should I expect my PD become current? 4-5 years.

    My lawyer did process my i-140/i-485 for the July visa Viasco, but i think they only send the i-140 and the AP/EAD forms. Is this possible and what are the benefit for these applications.

    Thanks





    2011 Keira Knightley keira knightley face. to replace Keira Knightley
  • to replace Keira Knightley



  • coolgc
    07-12 04:22 PM
    Hope, they move further in next month's bulletin.



    more...


    keira knightley face. keira-knightley-wiki
  • keira-knightley-wiki



  • feedfront
    10-21 01:26 PM
    Hi Guys

    At last today is my day.. online status changed to "Card Production Order" :)

    Hope every one will get soon.

    Thanks
    onemorecame

    Congrats dude, I had told you to hang in there and you would hear something in a week or two.





    keira knightley face. Keira Knightley Suits Up For
  • Keira Knightley Suits Up For



  • flresident
    04-08 11:36 AM
    I went to India for vacation in Dec end, 2008 and came back on Jan end, 2009.
    This was my 4th trip in 8 years.

    POE: Atlanta with my wife and 2 kids.
    process was lengthy but lady officer was very nice, usual questions, no issue at all.

    I renewed my H1b stamp in India also. same. usual questions about my job and visa. some questions to my wife also for H4 renewal. No issue at all.

    I hope this helps (in calming down) guys who are visiting india. No need to panic if your documents are ok.



    more...


    keira knightley face. A ghostly Keira Knightley
  • A ghostly Keira Knightley



  • ajju
    03-15 08:47 PM
    C'mon guys, what the hell have you been doing for so long?

    I mean look at the archived Visa Bulletins, you observe the following:

    1. EB2 was current for India ALL THROUGH 2003
    2. EB2 was current for India ALL THROUGH 2004
    3. EB2 was current for India till August 2005
    4. After the retrogression in 2005, EB2 India moved up quickly through 2003-2004 to April 2004 by the beginning of 2007

    5. Even after the summer 2007 fiasco (EB2 Current fro July, August 2007), the priority date for EB2 India moved to April 2004 and stayed there for 3 months

    What more do you wish for?
    I don't understand how there any can be anyone from 2004-2005 India still left in the EB2 category.

    This is pathetic. What the hell have you been waiting for?

    Most of these guys were stuck in backlog.. Welcome to the world of USCIS/DOL/DHS... Some would be Name Check victims too.. Though not many.. But a lot in backlog... Plus labor substitution...

    And when finaly most 2003 filed in July 2007 and had dates current for next 3 months.. The Processing was taking atleast 6 months...

    I seriosly hope that not may atleast with 2003 PD.. and dates should move to 2004 and beyong soon.. and this is practically possible...





    2010 See the Keira Knightley keira knightley face. And here we see Ms. Knightley
  • And here we see Ms. Knightley



  • rajuram
    11-10 10:09 PM
    bump



    more...


    keira knightley face. hairstyles Keira Knightley
  • hairstyles Keira Knightley



  • minimalist
    09-10 03:08 PM
    So there you have it - no vote on the bill today...


    I don't get it guys - what's up with this country - is this really what it's come down? Give me your tired, your poor - but DEFINITELY don't give me your talented, your educated and your promising. Because really - what are we going to do with people who actually pay taxes, contribute to the community and help bring prosperity.

    We would love to have just your best cotton-pickers...this is just a little disappointing - and yet I ask, what should we do now? We have 2 months to go - it's time to make a HUGE difference...
    Is the bill tabled or something?





    hair to replace Keira Knightley keira knightley face. Keira Christina Knightley
  • Keira Christina Knightley



  • vshar
    03-12 01:56 PM
    You are accusing IV for cheating before saying IV is a great platform. Can't you make up your mind. You sound more like that Congressman Massa from NY. I am no Glenn beck so now don't start to tickle me.

    I never accused IV for cheating but yes I do accuse IV for misconduct on April vis bulltein issue. misconduct does not mean cheating it means that they did not do what they are supposed to do at the time when all its members were anxious.



    more...


    keira knightley face. hot Keira Knightley join
  • hot Keira Knightley join



  • ujjwal_p
    10-10 05:45 PM
    If verified, you would end up in eating ham burger.

    Allow me :

    "We get caught laundering money, we're not going to white color resort prison. No, no, no. We're going to Federal pound me in the a** prison" -- Office Space





    hot keira-knightley-wiki keira knightley face. See more Keira Knightley
  • See more Keira Knightley



  • stucklabor
    07-24 10:29 AM
    USCIS cannot allow people to file for I-485 at its own discretion without visa number availability.

    By law, an immigrant visa number has to be available to the alien at the time the application for adjustment of status is filed. See Sec. 245 (a)(3) below.

    As someone already mentioned, everyone has full time jobs and can't respond to suggestions immediately. Thanks for the patience and the bright ideas.

    http://www.uscis.gov/lpBin/lpext.dll/inserts/slb/slb-1/slb-20/slb-7169?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm#slb-act245

    INA: ACT 245 - ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS OF NONIMMIGRANT TO THAT OF PERSON ADMITTED FOR PERMANENT RESIDENCE

    Sec. 245. [8 U.S.C. 1255]

    (a) The status of an alien who was inspected and admitted or paroled into the United States 1/ or the status of any other alien having an approved petition for classification under subparagraph (A)(iii), (A)(iv), (B)(ii), or (B)(iii) of section 204(a)(1) or may be adjusted by the Attorney General, in his discretion and under such regulations as he may prescribe, to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence if

    (1) the alien makes an application for such adjustment,

    (2) the alien is eligible to receive an immigrant visa and is admissible to the United States for permanent residence, and

    (3) an immigrant visa is immediately available to him at the time his application is filed.



    more...


    house Keira Knightley face for keira knightley face. keira knightley jawline.
  • keira knightley jawline.



  • sandiboy
    07-24 01:22 AM
    is she using her own FAQ? USCIS FAQ has different question at Q9.

    Yes this is the lawyer's own FAQ i was referring to.





    tattoo Keira Knightley Suits Up For keira knightley face. keira knightley hair
  • keira knightley hair



  • sureshj
    06-08 02:18 PM
    To solve the FBI name check problem, the following suggestions should be communicated to lawmaker if possible:

    1. Increase the fundings for FBI name check. The major reason of name check delay is due to lack of resources for manual name check.

    2. Introduce a conditional Green Card. Conditional green card is equivalent to green card, except with condition that it could be taken back IF AND ONLY IF the name check eventually fails to pass. Person with conditional green card enjoy all the benefits with normal green card, including transfering job freely, re-enter US freely, count years to citizenship, etc.

    3. People wants to file 485 can ask FBI do name check before they actaully file 485 with a certain amount of filing fee. So that the delay for FBI name check will not impact 485 processing too much.


    I could'nt agree with gcdreamer more...

    Consider this...
    1. FBI, I believe, has 2 rookie analysts dedicated to processing name checks and I heard USCIS pays $25 per name check.
    2. FBI has distributed databases in NY, CA, FL, etc. that are not networked. So they have to request name checks individually out of these databases.
    3. Name check ranks least in their priority list.
    4. FBI has increased their name check criteria from 2 (First name and Last Name) to, I think it is, 7 or 8 (part of the first name, part of the last name and few other combinations). This increases the chances of your name generating "hits" and falling into this blackhole.
    In addition to the above FBI (which normally receives ~1.5m name check requests per year) received ~6m in 2003. They are still recovering from that deluge. So now you see what's causing the delay.

    For USCIS this works out fine, since they rake in 15% of their annual revenue from EAD/AP renewals. They do not want to mess with this "free money" and reduce the processing time. And to top it all they can transfer the blame on FBI.

    In addition, to secure this "money train" USCIS cleverly issued a public memo earlier this year indicating WOM cases will be fought in court. To most this would have seemed like the end of WOM, but it is not. Applicants have since filed and won these cases. However the memo probably had its' desired effect...to discourage a majority of the applicants from filing WOM.

    I think USCIS has to be made accountable for the money they earn. The $25/name check is just not sufficient. More funding is necessary so that FBI can allocate more analysts to the job and also upgrade their IT infrastructure. Excuses such as "ball is in FBI's court" is just not acceptable. "Conditional Green card" (as suggested by gcdreamer) is excellant idea to alleviate the problems the "name check" victims face over the ~2 to 4 years they spend in this blackhole.

    PS: Just in case you are not aware of Senator Obama's initiative to address this problem here is a link where you can sign-up for whatever it is worth.
    http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?nc082505&1



    more...


    pictures A ghostly Keira Knightley keira knightley face. but Keira Knightley#39;s
  • but Keira Knightley#39;s



  • reddymjm
    06-03 05:01 PM
    dont do it ..on L1A under NIW he/she can get a GC without labour. Just file I140 and then 485 NIW ..that would be really stupid to move L1A to H1B
    Then wait for 180 days to take advantage of AC21.





    dresses See more Keira Knightley keira knightley face. Keira Knightley is the face of
  • Keira Knightley is the face of



  • chanduv23
    11-11 03:44 PM
    I am not sure what lobbying efforts would do for us, haven't worked so far...In my opinion we need more media visibility which makes politicians to take notice of us. In these troubled times they are open to any kind of ideas that would help the housing market.

    Just show the real numbers to the media -

    Approx 0.5 million people (well educated with decent earnings)
    Atleast 50 to 60% of these people could potentially buy houses if immigration related uncertainities are gone
    Potentially quarter of million buyers for houses, that is a lot!!

    I leave it up to IV core to followup on these ideas. I repeat, as I have done so many times, it is all about marketing + media presence. We won the July 2007 visa bulletin battle because of adverse media reaction to the state department. Grass roots stuff is all good, but no one will ever notice it.

    Please come up with ideas. Remember - IV core looks at all the posts and get ideas from the forums. You may want to start a thread saying - Lets all put our constructive thoughts about moving ahead with Obama administration here. People can posts their ideas, plans, implementations, strategies ...... and we can all discuss.

    Rajuram - your concern is valid and basically what is happening is - IV now needs some dedicated new generation members who can make a difference. thats how IV has been working from the beginnibg, people come and go - so do admins.

    You can help in this way by opening a thread to share new ideas and strategies.



    more...


    makeup hairstyles Keira Knightley keira knightley face. Keira Knightley face for
  • Keira Knightley face for



  • kaisersose
    02-21 04:12 PM
    I had one question. If there 140 K quota and 400 k employment AOS pending shuldnt they be cleared in 2-3 years (140k*3) since no matter what 140 k visas are going to get used (for example if there are leftovers others will get it)?

    Even assuming hereafter no visa numbers will be wasted, It is not exactly FIFO for that to happen.

    Consider this:

    a) The Indian Applicant started back in 2003. In 2009 everything is done except assigning a visa number to this case.
    b) There is a German Applicant who will start in 2008. In 2009 everything is done except assigning a visa number to this case.

    The German will get a visa number assigned and a green card, but the Indian will not as he still has thousands ahead of him waiting for visa numbers.

    Therefore 400K at 140K/ year is not how it works.





    girlfriend keira knightley hair keira knightley face. keira knightley face. Me amp; Terry - me doing My Keira Knightley face :
  • keira knightley face. Me amp; Terry - me doing My Keira Knightley face :



  • vin13
    11-11 04:12 PM
    Pappu has already informed that with the limited resources they are not currently considering to actively persue regarding Quarterly Spillover.

    So for now, we need to do what we can by ourselves.





    hairstyles hot Keira Knightley join keira knightley face. Keira Knightley stars in
  • Keira Knightley stars in



  • waitnwatch
    07-13 11:30 AM
    Reading through this thread I find this intense debate about the value and intentions of Murthy's letter.

    Let's first deal with the value part: This letter could be from any one of us or anybody else from Timbuktu. Why does this letter have any special significance except that the DHS secretary may read it because Murthy and the secretary are alumni of the same institution (see how carefully this part is added to the letter for our consumption). Now this feeds into the intention part. Even if Murthy wrote a letter to the DHS Secretary why did she have to publicize it on her website (except for the gullible among us to take notice). Generally publicized letters have value if they are from some influential policy maker or lawmaker. In this case Murthy is neither and so her letter does not add or subtract any value to this debate. So we are left with the question of who gains by publicizing this letter. Your guess is as good as mine.

    Ultimately I am left wondering why this thread was started in the first place except to garner cheap publicity. Do we really have so much time on our hands?





    anjs
    08-10 09:56 PM
    I am in for this.

    anjs





    pappu
    01-16 09:44 AM
    Thank you Anurakt and others that have signed up. Anurakt I am sure this time our members will take up your challange and make you pay $500