tribal band tattoo

images Black Tribal Tattoo Temporary tribal band tattoo. tribal band tattoos
  • tribal band tattoos



  • ashishgour
    09-10 02:39 PM
    can some one pls post the link for live telecast

    thanks

    http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/calendar.html





    wallpaper tribal band tattoos tribal band tattoo. tribal band tattoo.
  • tribal band tattoo.



  • alanoconnor
    08-15 03:57 PM
    All
    Charge-ability
    Areas
    Except
    Those
    Listed
    CHINA-
    mainland born INDIA MEXICO PHILIP-PINES
    Employ-ment
    -Based

    1st 01JAN07 01JAN07 01JAN07 01JAN07 01JAN07
    2nd 01JAN07 01JAN06 01APR04 01JAN07 01JAN07
    3rd 01AUG02 U U U 01AUG02
    Other
    Workers U U U U U
    4th 01JAN07 01JAN07 01JAN07 01JAN07 01JAN07
    Certain Religious Workers 01JAN07 01JAN07 01JAN07 01JAN07 01JAN07
    5th 01JAN07 01JAN07 01JAN07 01JAN07 01JAN07
    Targeted Employ-ment Areas/
    Regional Centers 01JAN07 01JAN07 01JAN07 01JAN07 01JAN07





    tribal band tattoo. Tribal Tattoo Arm Band Royalty
  • Tribal Tattoo Arm Band Royalty



  • hoolahoous
    03-16 12:37 AM
    And, please, gimme a break. H1B = high skilled? .....Most H1Bs, according to PUBLISHED research, earn less than $50,000.
    Dude, IT and software are low skill jobs..........wake up and smell the coffee. Your saying "highly skilled" and holding up a placard won't change that reality. No one wants any more low skilled EB3 types in this country anymore. They are found dime a dozen.


    wow.. u disciple of lou dobb ?? 50k !!!! in our company average salary of h1b is 125k (meaning some get much more than that, including me)!!
    IT and software is low skill ?? now I am not sure what YOU are smelling . h1b requires minimum 4 year engg. degree (what do u have ?? maybe you got it using some non academic skills)


    Yes i AM selfish..........

    exactly.. i agree





    2011 tribal band tattoo. tribal band tattoo. Tribal Armband Tattoos
  • Tribal Armband Tattoos



  • Macaca
    01-18 10:06 AM
    Its pathetic to see this thread going only to 5 pages, whereas the other thread w/discussion on 485 filing took that to almost 100 pages.

    In addition, only 2 out of the 100 pages have any useful content. Most of the posts are attitude problems.



    more...


    tribal band tattoo. arm and tattoos
  • arm and tattoos



  • stldude
    07-11 02:23 PM
    PD is May 2003, I-140 allready approved
    485 sent on July 02 ( missed the boat by a day).





    tribal band tattoo. Arm Band Tattoos Design tribal
  • Arm Band Tattoos Design tribal



  • bmoni
    04-09 06:43 PM
    Thanks Papu !!!! thats great....

    Visa Bulletin for May 2010 (http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4805.html)



    more...


    tribal band tattoo. (4 pairs of arm and tattoos
  • (4 pairs of arm and tattoos



  • virtual55
    07-03 09:11 AM
    with out a reliable website, we can't communicate and do all the important things(productive) you are talking. maintaining a reliable website doesn't need much funds.

    Anti immigrants will not know our plans if we may this a paid website.





    2010 Tribal Tattoo Arm Band Royalty tribal band tattoo. Black Tribal Tattoo Temporary
  • Black Tribal Tattoo Temporary



  • kondur_007
    06-08 07:01 PM
    There is going to be no spillover to EB2 India at all because according to the thread "Employment-Based Visa Number Movement and Predictions - from current Murthy Bulletin" thread Mr. Oppenheim (the guy from the DOS who sets the visa bulletin) said that EB1, EB4 and Eb5 might also retrogress (that is have to a cut off date which means they will not be current). If EB1, EB2 and EB5 retrogress and there is no spillover from EB2 ROW and there is no spillover from Family based visas there will not be any spillover to Eb2 India at all. There is absoluetely no difference between Eb3 India and Eb2 India except that EB3 India will be stuck in 2001 and Eb2 India might be stuck either in 2002 or early 2003. We are screwed for ages to come. Dont give me red for bringing this harsh reality, I myself am depressed

    Nobody should get red for expressing their thought!! So if at all I give you some, it would be only green!

    coming to your point: Even in the thread you referenced to, I have posted a comment "Mr. Oppenheim's statements do not add up...his statements logically contradict each other (well you can not expect LOGIC from USCIS). and so the exact scenario will only be clarified with VB, date movements and finally, their year end statistics".
    Accordingly, moving the EB2 I and C together, they have proven that "they are getting ready to spill over". Moreover, EB2 China has used up "its own quota" and will need spill over to move. EB2 ROW on the other had has not used up "its own quota" and will not need spill over (as it is current and not together with India and china). So any spill over from EB1 will come to EB2 India and China (effectively only to India). And if EB2 ROW does not use up their remaining numbers (which they have not so far) during the rest of fiscal year they will also spill to EB2 India.

    Now as far as future of EB2 vs EB3 is concerned, I personally believe (and this is just my personal belief....) that unless EB1 (specially EB1C) gets oversubscribed (as mentioned in other threads), EB2 should move quickly during next fiscal year. EB1 usage can only be known from year end data as and when they publish it.



    more...


    tribal band tattoo. Tribal Armband Tattoos Gallery
  • Tribal Armband Tattoos Gallery



  • wandmaker
    08-21 04:34 PM
    Has anyone else dealt with this or can you direct me to someone who knows what needs to be done and how?

    Most of the people here are under employment based green cards - So, I would recommend get yourself an attorney.





    hair Tribal Armband Tattoos tribal band tattoo. tribal band tattoo. ankle and
  • tribal band tattoo. ankle and



  • McLuvin
    03-12 01:55 PM
    finally the bulletin has been posted in the DOS website...

    Visa Bulletin for April 2010 (http://www.travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_4747.html)

    They have given a brief description about "BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON FREQUENTLY MISUNDERSTOOD POINTS"

    Applicants entitled to immigrant status become documentarily qualified at their own initiative and convenience. By no means has every applicant with a priority date earlier than a prevailing cut-off date been processed for final visa action. On the contrary, a significant amount of demand is received each month for applicants who have priority dates which are significantly earlier than the applicable cut-off dates. In addition, fluctuations in demand can cause cut-off date movement to slow, stop, or even retrogress. Retrogression is particularly possible near the end of the fiscal year as visa issuance approaches the annual limitations.

    Per-country limit: The annual per-country limitation of 7% is a cap which visa issuances to any single country may not exceed. Applicants compete for visas primarily on a worldwide basis. The country limitation serves to avoid monopolization of virtually all the annual limitation by applicants from only a few countries. This limitation is not a quota to which any particular country is entitled, however.

    Applicability of Section 202(a)(5): INA Section 202(a)(5), added by the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act, removed the per-country limit on Employment-based immigrants in any calendar quarter in which applicant demand for numbers in one or more Employment-based preferences is less than the total of such numbers available. In recent years, the application of Section 202(a)(5) has allowed countries such as China � mainland born and India to utilize large amounts of Employment First and Second preference numbers which would have otherwise gone unused. Such numbers are provided strictly in priority date order without regard to the foreign state chargeability, and the same cut-off date applies to any country benefiting from this provision.

    Applicability of Section 202(e): When visa demand by documentarily qualified applicants from a particular country exceeds the amount of numbers available under the annual numerical limitation, that country is considered to be oversubscribed. Oversubscription may require the establishment of an earlier cut-off date than that which applies to a particular visa category on a worldwide basis. The prorating of numbers for an oversubscribed country follows the same percentages specified for the division of the worldwide annual limitation among the preferences. (Note that visa availability cut-off dates for oversubscribed areas may not be later than worldwide cut-off dates, if any, for the respective preferences.)

    Furthermore, Section 202(a)(2) reads, �2) Per country levels for family-sponsored and employment-based immigrants. Subject to paragraphs (3), (4), and (5), the total number of immigrant visas made available to natives of any single foreign state or dependent area under subsections (a) and (b) of section 203 in any fiscal year may not exceed seven percent (in the case of a single foreign state) or two percent (in the case of a dependent area) of the total number of such visas made available under such subsections in that fiscal year.� The seven percent per-country limit specified in INA 202(a)(2) is considered to be for both Family-sponsored and Employment-based numbers combined.

    Allocation of visa numbers under Section 202(e) is accomplished as follows:

    If based on historical patterns or current demand it appears that during a fiscal year number use by aliens chargeable to a particular country will exceed the per-country numerical limit for both the Family and Employment preferences combined, that country would be considered oversubscribed. Both the Family and Employment preferences would be subject to the prorating provisions of INA 202(e)(1).
    Sometimes during a fiscal year it may become apparent that because of a lack of demand in the Family preferences, number use by aliens chargeable to an oversubscribed country will be well within the per-country numerical limit. In such case the excess Family numbers would be made available to the Employment preferences subject to the prorating provisions of INA 202(e)(1). Each of the first three Employment categories would receive 28.6% of the excess numbers, and each of the Fourth and Fifth preference categories 7.1%. (Fall-across would likewise apply if an oversubscribed country lacked sufficient demand in the Employment preferences but had excess demand in the Family preferences.)
    If a foreign state other than an oversubscribed country has little Family preference demand but considerable Employment preference demand, the otherwise unused Family numbers fall across to Employment (and vice versa) for purposes of that foreign state�s annual numerical limit. For example, in FY-2009 South Korea used a grand total of 15,899 Family and Employment preference numbers, of which 1,688 were Family numbers and 14,211 were Employment numbers. This grand total was well within the FY-2009 per-country numerical limit of 25,620 Family and Employment numbers combined, so South Korea was not oversubscribed. The unused Family numbers were distributed within the Employment categories, allowing South Korea to be considerably over the 9,800 Employment limit which would have been in effect had it been an oversubscribed country.



    more...


    tribal band tattoo. Wrist Band Tattoo
  • Wrist Band Tattoo



  • gcseeker2002
    12-28 02:49 PM
    I had similar problem with United last year. I was flying thruogh Malaysian airlines and United charged me for extra 20 LBs. But it was checked in till India.
    Delta is more helpful that way, one of my friends family had separate tickets on Delta and Malaysian, but the delta checkin guy checked in for both flights upto India, and even allowed the 70lbs on the delta part of the flight.





    hot arm and tattoos tribal band tattoo. even tribal band tattoos.
  • even tribal band tattoos.



  • kanakabyraju
    07-13 07:29 AM
    All right I am current again..exactly after 2 years

    So I am having the butterflies in my tummy with nostalgia of my nail biting thriller during 2008 July-Sep bulletin, where I got royally screwed.

    mwuahhhaaaa...c'mon..come to papa now :D:D

    tick..tock..tick..tock :rolleyes:

    You really made me laugh. Thanks



    more...


    house stock vector : Tribal Tattoo tribal band tattoo. celtic arm and tattoo.
  • celtic arm and tattoo.



  • sirinme
    11-04 11:37 AM
    Nrc2008063524





    tattoo Arm Band Tattoos Design tribal tribal band tattoo. tribal band tattoos.
  • tribal band tattoos.



  • EdenMN
    02-19 05:04 PM
    As we know this bill won't surive due to current economic conditions...How about making it attrcative by adding 5k fees if person wants GC staying more than 5years



    more...


    pictures (4 pairs of arm and tattoos tribal band tattoo. Tribal Band Tattoo
  • Tribal Band Tattoo



  • transpass
    04-09 10:20 PM
    This is an "Ouch..." visa bulletin.

    Dont want to be passimistic or discourage anyone; I have always been optimistic and will remain so...

    However, this suggests that there will not be any fall down (previously called spillover) from EB4 and may not even be much from EB5 (Last year this was the major factor that gave 10k additional numbers to EB2 India). Lookes like people are finding alternate ways (who can) by these routes.

    EB1 used up all its numbers last year and we dont know what will happen this year.

    EB2 ROW usage looks low, but then again no movement in EB2 India...

    Patience and persistence....

    Good Luck to all of us.

    Does anyone have numbers for spillover last year category wise? I mean, last year how many EB4, EB5 and EB1 left out visas got spilled over to EB2? Thanks...





    dresses even tribal band tattoos. tribal band tattoo. Aussie Arm Band Tattoo cross
  • Aussie Arm Band Tattoo cross



  • natrajs
    07-11 10:49 PM
    You are absolutely right dude :)
    All (whose PD will be current) the Eb2 India folks try your luckkkkkkkkkkkkk..


    Even after your PD becomes current you are still at the mercy of the IO and RD, ND and all the odd's

    Its like Mega Million or Power ball lotto. I don't trust USCIS/DOS until I have the GC plastic in my hand.

    In mean while we have to focus on the legislative efforts, Especially for EB3-I with out that it will be very hard.

    So folks be active and get involved in IV's effort



    more...


    makeup Tribal Armband Tattoos Gallery tribal band tattoo. stock vector : Tribal Tattoo
  • stock vector : Tribal Tattoo



  • pdaug2002
    03-17 10:34 AM
    EB3 - India
    PD : Aug 2002





    girlfriend tribal band tattoos. tribal band tattoo. hair house Tribal armband
  • hair house Tribal armband



  • mbartosik
    11-27 07:50 PM
    Nrc2008065862





    hairstyles Wrist Band Tattoo tribal band tattoo. My star armband tattoo
  • My star armband tattoo



  • chanduv23
    03-17 10:08 AM
    Substitute labors for EB2 should not IMPACT the delay more than 3 to 6 months. The reason is total EB2 labor india cases approved in 2004 itself is 3500(Straight out of DOL database, published on this forum last year). Some of these cases may have been substituted, worst case, lets say 100% of them applied to I-485. Now the number is 3 times that of 3500. that is 10500(including spouse and 1 child on average).

    Another thing you need to consider is If anycase had a PD before sept 2004 and was filed for I-485 before July 2007. That must have got the approval unless there was a namecheck delay.

    That should reduce the number to half., 5500(including dependent cases). This is my educated guess, Please dont pick on me. It wont help anybody.

    Below are 3 categories left as per my analysis....

    1) the applications filed in or after july 2007 OR
    2) applications had a PD after sept 2004
    3) Namecheck delayed cases.

    Chances are that the volume of Subsitutions and porting PD is massive in July , 2007. Almost every Tom, Dick and Harry filed for 485 at that time. News spread like wild fire about the availability of visas and lawyers and consulting companies wanted to do maximum utilization and maximum business. People applied substituted labors for their cousins, friends etc.... and got EAD and AP, May not be working for the sponsering employer.





    sunnysharma
    07-05 03:42 PM
    I strongly believe that Immigration Voice website should be paid website.
    People should be willing to spend $20 per month for the information the website provides(foreg: It was useful for self filers to file I485 and saved atleast $2000 each person), I think $20 per month, should be enough for maintaining 99% reliable website and for its lobbying efforts and law suit etc.

    Guys please share your thoughts.

    even if 3000 members join paid website that will be 3000*20 = $60000 per month and $720000 per year which is substantial amount to perform lobbying, law suit, maintain website etc


    $ 20.00 per month is not bad at all...This is min. we should be contributing to site..





    gsc999
    09-26 08:55 PM
    Here's a classic example ..

    If you look at the other threads on this forum you have people against the Durban bill coz it affects F-1 students . There is another section which is against Grassley coz it'll affect Consultants trying to get H1-B. I do understand Grassley's bill can have many implications and need to be opposed, but the focus still has to be towards alleviating the Employment based GC issues.

    I don't think CNN is to be faulted that much coz IV itself has lost its focus towards Employment Based Green Cards. period. thats what is started out to be and needs to come back on that track instead of trying to act as a platform for all Legal Immigration issues.

    Simply put IV is " EB-1/2/3- related org" ok..ok.. add in those millionaires who put in a million dollars for GC too.

    ---
    Hi,

    Thanks for your feedback:
    "I don't think CNN is to be faulted that much coz IV itself has lost its focus towards Employment Based Green Cards."

    Your comment doesn't make sense to me. Please explain.